The WIN-Gallup 2012 Religiosity Index asked, “Irrespective of whether you attend a place of worship or not, would you say you are a religious person, not a religious persons or a convinced atheist?” With a global average of 59% who call themselves religious, Armenia is in the top ten most religious countries by declared level of religious belief, with 92% considering themselves religious (with a further 3% non-religious, 2% convinced atheists and 2% unsure). 84% of Georgians say the same (12% non-religious, 1% convinced atheists and 3% unsure). Much fewer Azerbaijanis consider themselves religious (44%) and 51% say they are non-religious (0% convinced atheists and 5% unsure). The 2012 CB also shows that a majority of people in all three countries of the South Caucasus consider religion to be important in their daily lives (although attendance of religious services is much lower). South Caucasians thus appear to have more of a subjective attachment to religion.
The Helsinki Committee’s 2010
Study on Freedom of Religion in Armenia noted that, “Nationalist ideas
began to replace the old Soviet ideology, and the traditional church was
often equated to national identity”. Accordingly, the special roles of
the Armenian Apostolic Church in Armenia and Georgian Orthodox Church in
Georgia were recognized by each state through signed concordats in 2007 and
2002, respectively. For some, atheism is thus a rejection of these established
churches which are viewed as important elements of national identity. Though
the relationship between the State and the CMB (Caucasian Muslim Board) in
Azerbaijan is more complex, Islam similarly plays a crucial cultural part in
Azerbaijani national identity.
The numbers of and exposure to atheists are negligible in the South Caucasus. In the 2012 CB, 4% of Armenians 0.2% in Azerbaijan and 0.7% in Georgia said they had no religion. However, being irreligious, indifferent and atheist are not synonymous. Regarding contact, the majority of people in all three countries say they have not had any contact with atheists. Interestingly, Azerbaijanis appear to have the most contact with atheists on a regular basis (10% on a daily basis).
The numbers of and exposure to atheists are negligible in the South Caucasus. In the 2012 CB, 4% of Armenians 0.2% in Azerbaijan and 0.7% in Georgia said they had no religion. However, being irreligious, indifferent and atheist are not synonymous. Regarding contact, the majority of people in all three countries say they have not had any contact with atheists. Interestingly, Azerbaijanis appear to have the most contact with atheists on a regular basis (10% on a daily basis).
There are overwhelmingly negative attitudes to marriage with atheists in all three countries. Georgians show the highest level of uncertainty (15%). Armenians have the most negative attitudes to this idea (77% object overall), while Azerbaijanis are slightly more tolerant when it comes to having an atheist in the family.
However, people have more accepting attitudes towards doing business with atheists. This may indicate a tendency in the South Caucasus to object to more personal relationships with atheists, while being more accepting of professional relationships
Negative attitudes towards atheists (despite having almost
no contact with them), are widespread across the South Caucasus. Despite their
subjective attachment to their religions, people in the South Caucasus perceive
religious belief as a desirable quality in business partners and spouses,
though it is more significant in a personal relationship such as the latter.
Although there is a notable difference in the declared religiosity between
Azerbaijanis, on the one hand, and Armenians and Georgians on the other, all three
groups have overwhelmingly negative attitudes towards atheists. Georgians are
the most uncertain on their attitudes towards business and marriage with
atheists, whilst Azerbaijanis are most uncertain about their contact with
atheists.
As one interviewee from the Helsinki Foundation’s study said, “I have a positive attitude towards the [Armenian Apostolic] Church because it was an institution created by Armenian people, rather than imposed on us by anyone from above.” This quote illustrates post-Soviet perceptions of religious identities well – Soviet atheism being perceived as an imposition from above and abroad, in contrast to the traditional religious beliefs of the peoples of the South Caucasus.
Attitudes towards atheism is one of many complex and interesting topics in the South Caucasus which would benefit from further study. What do you think are possible causes for the negative attitudes shown? Explore further by downloading any of the Caucasus Barometer datasets here.
As one interviewee from the Helsinki Foundation’s study said, “I have a positive attitude towards the [Armenian Apostolic] Church because it was an institution created by Armenian people, rather than imposed on us by anyone from above.” This quote illustrates post-Soviet perceptions of religious identities well – Soviet atheism being perceived as an imposition from above and abroad, in contrast to the traditional religious beliefs of the peoples of the South Caucasus.
Attitudes towards atheism is one of many complex and interesting topics in the South Caucasus which would benefit from further study. What do you think are possible causes for the negative attitudes shown? Explore further by downloading any of the Caucasus Barometer datasets here.
I don't quite understand the wording used in the question about the importance of religion. You report that respondents were asked if religion was "very important" and "rather important," among other choices. But in English "very" and "rather" mean exactly the same thing. Can you give any further information on this? Are there nuances in Russian (or the three local languages) that are not present in English? Perhaps for a social science survey, it would have been more meaningful to provide more differentiated choices, such as "very," "somewhat," "not very," and "not at all" important.
ReplyDelete